Technology
Principles

The detection methodology and AI principles that make FalsiFind's results defensible in regulatory and legal contexts.

Core Technology Principles

Three foundational principles that shape every technical decision we make.

Multi-Model Detection

No single model can detect all synthetic media. We ensemble multiple detection approaches, each specialized for different generation methods, and combine their signals for robust classification.

Acoustic feature analysis for voice
Frequency domain analysis for images
Temporal consistency for video
Generation artifact detection across all media

Cryptographic Evidence

Every detection generates a cryptographically signed evidence bundle using RSA-PSS signatures. Timestamps follow RFC 3161 standards. Evidence is tamper-evident and designed for regulatory and legal scrutiny.

SHA-256 content hashing
RSA-PSS digital signatures
RFC 3161 timestamp tokens
Certificate chain verification

Minimized Media Retention

Customer media is held for 30 days or less, used only to train FalsiFind's detection models, and deleted when training completes. Customers who require it can use zero-storage processing, where media is analyzed in memory and discarded immediately.

30-day maximum media retention
Detection-model training only, never generative
Customer-controlled evidence retention
Zero-storage processing option

Technical Approach

How we approach detection challenges with practical, defensible methodology.

Generation-Agnostic Detection

Our models identify artifacts of synthetic generation rather than fingerprinting specific tools. This means detection works against new generation methods, not just the ones we've seen before.

Continuous Model Updates

Detection models are updated regularly as new generation techniques emerge. Updates deploy without service interruption and without requiring customer code changes.

Confidence Calibration

Our confidence scores are calibrated to reflect true probabilities. A 90% confidence score means approximately 90% of similar cases are correctly classified, not an arbitrary threshold.

What We Keep Proprietary

We're transparent about our principles and approach, but we don't disclose implementation details that could help adversaries evade detection.

Specific model architectures and training data
Detection thresholds and decision boundaries
Feature extraction methodology details
Adversarial robustness techniques

Technical Deep Dive? Let's Talk

Our technical team can discuss architecture, integration, and detection methodology in detail with your engineering and security teams.